Oh no, another Nvidia driver repository? Why? This repository reflects my personal view for the way the driver should be packaged for Fedora and CentOS/RHEL. It’s somewhat different from ELRepo repositories for RHEL/CentOS and from RPMFusion packages for Fedora.
Table of Contents
Repository installation
To install the repository on a supported Fedora distribution, run as root the following command:
dnf config-manager --add-repo=https://negativo17.org/repos/fedora-nvidia.repo
To install the repository on CentOS/RHEL:
yum-config-manager --add-repo=https://negativo17.org/repos/epel-nvidia.repo
The Nvidia software packages are available for installation by default also in Gnome Software.
Please note that the driver will show up only if your system matches one of the PCI ID supported by the driver. Otherwise, only the other Nvidia programs (mostly for CUDA development) will show up in the software center.
What’s different?
First of all the packaging is a lot simplified; more stuff is compiled from source, smaller packages and more options. This packages try to comply as maximum to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines; which means they have debuginfo packages, default Fedora’s GCC compile time options (where possible) and standard locations for binaries, data and docs.
What follows below, is a detailed explanation of all the “differences” from the various Nvidia driver packages that I was able to spot on the web and a detailed description on how to install components, etc.
Nvidia drivers
Packaging
- nvidia-settings, nvidia-persistenced, nvidia-xconfig and nvidia-modprobe are compiled from source.
- All RPM filters except for GL and OpenCL libraries have been removed, so there is no weird dependency option in the SPEC file. RPM pulls in all correct requirements on its own. This is to avoid pulling in the Nvidia drivers instead of the Mesa libraries or in place of the new open source OpenCL support that’s in Fedora.
- Simplified packaging with much simpler and readable SPEC file.
- Dependency on libva-vdpau-driver. So in Totem, or any other libVA supported application you can benefit from VDPAU acceleration.
- Sources are generated with a script and inserted individually in the various packages; so it can be easily reproduced just by changing the version and rerunning the script.
nvidia-xconfig
is not required on anything that uses the modular X.org directives, as it writes too much in the configuration file (keyboards, monitors, etc.) and the required entries should be written in separate configuration files under/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d
. The package is still available as it’s required to speed up some configuration like multi-monitor setups with SLI Mosaic enabled from the command line, but not installed by default.- The NVIDIA OpenGL-based Framebuffer Capture (NvFBCOpenGL) libraries (NvFBC and NvIFR) are private APIs that are only available to NVIDIA approved partners for use in remote graphics scenarios (i.e. Steam In-Home Streaming hardware encoding); so they are packaged in another small package called
nvidia-driver-NvFBCOpenGL
. - The
nvidia-settings
package now builds the externallibXNVCtrl.so
library that can be used to control the graphic cards through the NV-CONTROL extension. This library updates the old and obsolete one in Fedora. - The
nvidia-settings
binary is compiled with GTK3 instead of GTK2 on Fedora and RHEL/CentOS 7+. - The driver can be installed separately from the
nvidia-settings
utility, so if you simply want a working driver and do not care about details, your experience should be as close as possible to the one with open source drivers.
Versioning
- ELRepo ships 32 bit compatibility libraries in a separate package with x86_64 as the architecture and “32bit” in the name. 32 bit libraries should be like in RPMFusion, with an i686 package installable in parallel with the x86_64 one. There are no other packages in the distribution that are built for x86_64, with “32bit” in their name that contain i686 binaries (!), so Nvidia drivers should not be an exception. So no separate “32bit.x86_64” package for 32 bit libraries also on CentOS/RHEL; just install
nvidia-driver-libs.i686
. - Versions are not hidden; all packages have the same driver version.
- No alternatives system, only the latest version which integrates CUDA support is available. For older releases nouveau works great; and anything below a GeForce 8xxx it’s in my opinion too low end to play anything modern. And Quake 3 and Doom 3 work greatly with nouveau, so that’s not a case!
- The CentOS/RHEL repository contains the “Long Lived Branch version” where less changes occur; while Fedora repositories contains the “Short Lived Branch version”. Beta CentOS/RHEL and Fedora’s rawhide repositories will contain the “Beta Branch version”
CUDA support
- CUDA libraries/tools for the driver are split into subpackages. There’s no need to install all the CUDA libraries and tools on a system that has only one adapter and is used for occasional gaming or for simple office use. This can save ~120 MB worth of installed libraries. nvidia-persistenced falls in this category as it’s not needed on a normal laptop or gaming system.
- Complete packaged CUDA stack has been added for all supported distributions, all the packages provide/require/obsolete the relevant packages in the Nvidia CUDA repository; so you can enable this repository along with the official Nvidia CUDA one (x86_64 systems only).
Kernel modules
- Multiple choice of kernel module packages; akmod (RPMFusion) for Fedora and binary kmod (Kernel ABI whitelists) for CentOS/RHEL. In addition to this, on both distributions dkms packages are available. This way all cases and personal preferences are covered for both distributions.
- The Nvidia udev rules leverage
nvidia-modprobe
command in the system to create devices and set permissions even when the userspace libraries have not been loaded yet, covering the case of Wayland only sessions and compute only system without display userspace components installed. - The
nvidia-uvm
module has a soft dependency on thenvidia
module, making sure that these modules are not included in the initrd (thing that would happen by using systemd’s configuration (module-s-load.d
). UDev rules make sure the module has proper permissions. - Choice of proprietary or open source license kernel modules.
Default configuration
- Dracut options are depending on the distribution; so no more “vga=normal is an obsolete option” at boot. Each distribution gets its own specific GRUB options for booting.
- 96 DPI is written in the default
xorg.conf
config file. Why? Gnome 3 by defaults hard-codes a 96×96 DPI resolution, most of the free drivers do (intel, nouveau, etc.) as the EDID is almost never reliable (please see the excellent Adam’s Jackson post where he explains this). As an example, if you install the Nvidia drivers on a RHEL/CentOS 6 laptop where you used to have nouveau installed (96 DPI hardcoded), the fonts gets 90% of the time supersize and ugly as Gnome 2 and the Nvidia driver do not hard-code 96 DPI like Gnome 3. - Make X.org NVIDIA Files section to be loaded latest in case there are other packages providing a custom Files section.
- Use new OutputClass directive on X.org server 1.16 (and later) to load the driver and do not rely on an edited
/etc/X11/xorg.conf
file. This also removes editing of thexorg.conf
file from the package scriptlets. This does not hardcode the 96 DPI resolution. - Add the
IgnoreABI
directive by default on Fedora rawhide builds.
Kernel modesetting and Wayland support
Kernel mode setting on the nvidia-drm
module is enabled by default along with the console frame buffer driver.
Distribution and Nvidia driver version support
Here is a rundown of Nvidia supported drivers and options split by distribution. Basically, CentOS/RHEL will always get a Long Lived branch release if possible, Fedora always a Short Lived branch release, and unreleased distributions will always get a Beta driver.
Operating system | CentOS / RHEL | Fedora | rawhide |
---|---|---|---|
Driver branch | Long Lived | Short Lived Long Lived | Short Lived Long Lived Beta |
Video Codec SDK | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Architectures: x86_64 aarch64 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Basic nvidia driver: nvidia-driver nvidia-driver-libs nvidia-libXNVCtrl nvidia-kmod-common | Yes | Yes | Yes |
CUDA libraries and tools: libnvidia-ml nvidia-driver-cuda nvidia-driver-cuda-libs nvidia-persistenced | Yes | Yes | Yes |
OpenGL Framebuffer Capture: libnvidia-fbc | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Nvidia tools: nvidia-modprobe nvidia-settings nvidia-xconfig | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Binary kernel modules (kABI): kmod-nvidia | Yes | No | No |
DKMS kernel modules: dkms-nvidia | Yes | Yes | Yes |
aKMOD kernel modules: akmod-nvidia | No | Yes | Yes |
32 bit compatibility on x86_64: libnvidia-ml nvidia-libXNVCtrl nvidia-driver-libs nvidia-driver-cuda-libs | Yes | Yes | Yes |
VDPAU libraries | Yes | Yes | Yes |
EGLStream-based Wayland external platform | Yes | Yes | Yes |
GBM EGL external platform library | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Optimus laptops
The driver should install and operate cleanly whether you are installing it on a system which has one or more discrete Nvidia cards or an Optimus laptop with an Intel and a Nvidia card. Nothing to do to enable or configure Optimus.
This is up to the point that when the drivers are installed, you can even turn off Optimus on or off in your system Bios (if your laptop allows that) and the only difference you should see is that there’s an additional VGA card enabled in your system (check with lspci
) and that the Nvidia control panel switches between a PRIME Display, like in this picture:
And a normal RandR managed one, like in this one:
Everything else should not be different from your normal experience.
Limitations with the Nvidia driver
The limitations are the same as provided by the Nvidia driver, this means that if you are running it on an Optimus laptop, the Intel card can never power off. Which means higher power consumption, unfortunately. If you have an Optimus laptop and absolutely need the proprietary drivers, my suggestion is still to disable Optimus in the Bios.
Limitations with the OSS stack
On the contrary, if you use the OSS stack (nouveau/intel
) the second card can be powered off if there’s no application running on it or display directly connected to one of the card’s outputs. That’s the best reason to use the OSS drivers at all if you you’re not doing serious gaming or 3D work:
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/vgaswitcheroo/switch 0:IGD:+:Pwr:0000:00:02.0 1:DIS: :DynOff:0000:01:00.0
You also got the nifty selection menu about running your game on the discrete card on Gnome, which is really cool:
It will power up the video card just before launching the process. Launching a program through that menu entry is like starting it from the command line with the DRI_PRIME variable declared. For example, the same as above would be:
$ DRI_PRIME=1 quake3 & $ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/vgaswitcheroo/switch 0:IGD:+:Pwr:0000:00:02.0 1:DIS: :DynPwr:0000:01:00.0
As you can see, the discrete video card is turned on. For Steam, you still need to edit each of your game to run on the Nvidia card:
SLI systems
SLI is now enabled by default with the Auto profile, there’s nothing to do if you have a SLI system. If you need any different SLI option (AA, SFR, etc.), just override it in X.org configuration files.
Nouveau fallback
With the new expanded OutputClass
support for X, as carried out by Hans, it’s now super easy to switch to the OSS stack if the proprietary Nvidia driver somehow does not work. No user space component is touched, as soon as the Nvidia kernel module is not loaded (check on /sys/module/nvidia
), the desktop starts with the normal OSS components you get with a normal installation. Thanks to all the work done on libglvnd, the libraries loaded are the correct one for the driver you are running.
This means that the performance of the Nvidia card would be abysmal, but still you would get a nice desktop and browser to Google around for answers on how to fix it :).
Sample installation
Here is an example. Let’s assume you have a freshly installed CentOS system with a recent Nvidia GPU and you want to:
- Install the driver for gaming
- Play Vulkan enabled games
- Want to be comfortable with the Nvidia control panel
- Play 32 bit games (Vulkan included) on a 64 bit system
- Play 32 bit Vulkan games on a 64 bit system
# yum install nvidia-driver nvidia-driver-libs.i686 Last metadata expiration check: 0:05:30 ago on Tue 05 Feb 2019 06:52:50 AM CET. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: nvidia-driver x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 2.4 M nvidia-driver-libs i686 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 18 M Installing dependencies: akmod-nvidia x86_64 3:415.27-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 10 M nvidia-driver-cuda-libs x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 25 M nvidia-driver-libs x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 34 M nvidia-kmod-common noarch 3:415.27-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 10 k akmods noarch 0.5.6-17.fc29 updates 22 k egl-wayland x86_64 1.1.1-3.fc29 updates 29 k kernel-devel x86_64 4.20.6-200.fc29 updates 13 M mesa-libEGL i686 18.2.8-1.fc29 updates 112 k mesa-libgbm i686 18.2.8-1.fc29 updates 39 k libglvnd-egl i686 1:1.1.0-2.fc29 fedora 45 k libglvnd-gles i686 1:1.1.0-2.fc29 fedora 32 k libglvnd-opengl i686 1:1.1.0-2.fc29 fedora 37 k libglvnd-opengl x86_64 1:1.1.0-2.fc29 fedora 39 k libva-vdpau-driver x86_64 0.7.4-22.fc29 fedora 60 k libwayland-server i686 1.16.0-1.fc29 fedora 38 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 17 Packages Total download size: 103 M Installed size: 385 M Is this ok [y/N]:
As you can see, this system has akmod enabled kernel modules and libraries for running 32 bit applications. The amount of data to download for the drivers is really small compared to packages that contain CUDA libraries and tools.
Package installation
If you are booting the system in UEFI mode; as a prerequisite to installing any external module (not built into the kernel package), you have to disable UEFI Secure Boot in the system configuration. All modules contained in the kernel package are signed with keys that are generated during build and deleted when packaging. If you want to preserve Secure Boot, you need to sign the modules yourself and import the keys into your hardware module. Doing so is out of scope here; if you need a decent guide just follow Red Hat’s guide for signing kernel modules.
First of all remove all the Nvidia drivers you might have on your system due to RPMFusion, ELRepo, or the Nvidia CUDA repository. This is usually accomplished with the following root command:
yum -y remove *nvidia*
Then, to install the Nvidia driver and its control panel utility in CentOS/RHEL with the binary kABI (Kernel ABI whitelist) module (this is the default on CentOS/RHEL), perform the following command:
yum -y install nvidia-driver nvidia-settings
To do the same in Fedora, using akmod modules, perform the following command:
dnf -y install nvidia-driver nvidia-settings
Specific driver installations
For both Fedora and CentOS/RHEL distributions it’s possible to install additional packages and / or variant of the basic kernel modules. This paragraph contains some examples. Make sure you have the EPEL repository enabled if you plan to use DKMS modules on CentOS/RHEL.
akmod kernel module variant (Fedora):
dnf -y install nvidia-driver akmod-nvidia
DKMS kernel module variant (Fedora/CentOS/RHEL):
yum/dnf -y install nvidia-driver dkms-nvidia
To add 32 bit libraries on a 64 bit system (for games or applications like Steam):
yum/dnf -y install nvidia-driver-libs.i686
Proprietary and open source kernel modules
Since almost a year, the Nvidia driver ships with two different implementations of the kernel modules, one proprietary and one open source. The open source one as of drivers 545.x is now considered beta quality also for the workstations, so it seems a good moment to start shipping it.
The open source one is supposed to be the only one that will be kept in the future, but at the moment both are available and both differ in terms of functionality. You can read about the main differences in terms of functionality and what chips they support in the official documentation.
I did not want to introduce another variation of the kernel modules beside akmod
s, kABI
and DKMS
, this would have created even more confusion and lots of dependencies in the SPEC files for the variations. The new akmod and DKMS packages ship both sources (MIT/GPL and proprietary kernel modules) and allow you to switch between one or the other through a configuration file.
Considering that in the long run only the open source variant will remain, I wanted to make this as transparent as possible for the users. Basically, if you don’t care and just want something that works, nothing has changed for you.
The two sources get referenced as they are referenced inside the Nvidia run file, namely “kernel
” for the original proprietary kernel modules and “kernel-open
” for the new open source variation.
The following instructions show you how to switch between one implementation or the other.
DKMS
Check which version you have installed:
# modinfo -l nvidia
NVIDIA
Change the type of modules you want to use and trigger a rebuild and a reinstall:
# sed -i -e 's/kernel$/kernel-open/g' /etc/nvidia/kernel.conf
# dkms build -m nvidia/545.29.02 --force
# dkms install -m nvidia/545.29.02 --force
Now check again the license and you should see that it has changed to MIT/GPL:
# modinfo -l nvidia
Dual MIT/GPL
# reboot
To switch back, change the configuration again and then trigger the same process for rebuilding installing:
# sed -i -e 's/kernel-open$/kernel/g' /etc/nvidia/kernel.conf
# dkms build -m nvidia/545.29.02 --force
# dkms install -m nvidia/545.29.02 --force
# reboot
akmods
Check which version you have installed:
# modinfo -l nvidia
NVIDIA
Change the type of modules you want to use and trigger a rebuild and a reinstall:
# sed -i -e 's/kernel$/kernel-open/g' /etc/nvidia/kernel.conf
# akmods --rebuild
Now check again the license and you should see that it has changed to MIT/GPL:
# modinfo -l nvidia
Dual MIT/GPL
# reboot
To switch back, change the configuration again and then trigger the same process for rebuilding installing:
# sed -i -e 's/kernel-open$/kernel/g' /etc/nvidia/kernel.conf
# akmods --rebuild
# reboot
Additional driver configuration to your system
To add additional configuration to your system, just create the /etc/X11/xorg.conf
file. For example:
Section "Device"
Identifier "Device0"
Driver "nvidia"
Option "NoLogo" "true"
Option "DPI" "96 x 96"
Option "SLI" "Auto"
Option "nvidiaXineramaInfoOrder" "DFP-0"
Option "metamodes" "GPU-a493fbbb-7d76-86a2-8764-d76d487a75a7.DVI-I-1: nvidia-auto-select +0+0, GPU-c02960a4-be28-d5ce-8b02-be04b5e2550b.DVI-I-1: nvidia-auto-select +1680+0"
Option "BaseMosaic" "on"
EndSection
In this example we have 2 video cards with one monitor each, so we enabled SLI, Base Mosaic to have multi monitor support on SLI and make a layout with the second GPU monitor on the right of the first one. Also, we fix the DPI to 96×96, which is the hardcoded default in Gnome and in Open Source drivers.
Configuration for CUDA only systems
Your system might only be used for CUDA development and not require the X server to be running the DDX driver at all, so you might want to tweak the configuration a bit to make the system load (for example) the Intel driver as the main display and just the Nvidia driver for GPU workloads. In this case you have two options.
Option with only CUDA components installed
To install just the CUDA components of the driver and not the OpenGL libraries and all files required by the DDX part of the driver, proceed to install as follows:
# yum install nvidia-driver-cuda Last metadata expiration check: 0:22:51 ago on Tue 05 Feb 2019 06:52:50 AM CET. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: nvidia-driver-cuda x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 308 k Installing dependencies: akmod-nvidia x86_64 3:415.27-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 10 M nvidia-driver-NVML x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 457 k nvidia-driver-cuda-libs x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 25 M nvidia-kmod-common noarch 3:415.27-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 10 k nvidia-persistenced x86_64 3:415.27-2.fc29 fedora-multimedia 40 k akmods noarch 0.5.6-17.fc29 updates 22 k kernel-devel x86_64 4.20.6-200.fc29 updates 13 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 8 Packages Total download size: 49 M Installed size: 168 M Is this ok [y/N]:
As you can see, there are no components providing OpenGL or DDX drivers installed on the system. This will not use any X (or Wayland) configuration compared to what has been installed by default on your system.
On top of this, you can still select what kind of kernel modules you want ot have installed (kABI, akmods and dkms).
The device files are created by the udev rules that call the nvidia-modprobe
command, it contains a SUID binary that creates the device files and set the appropriate permissions. The same binary is called directly by Nvidia libraries when accessing a user space component that would require device files access:
$ for i in $(rpm -ql nvidia-driver-libs.x86_64 nvidia-driver-cuda-libs.x86_64 | grep \.so); do strings $i | grep nvidia-modprobe > /dev/null && echo $i done /usr/lib64/gbm/nvidia-drm_gbm.so /usr/lib64/libnvidia-allocator.so.1 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-allocator.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-api.so.1 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-cfg.so.1 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-cfg.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-eglcore.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-glcore.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-glsi.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 /usr/lib64/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libcuda.so /usr/lib64/libcuda.so.1 /usr/lib64/libcuda.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so.1 /usr/lib64/libnvcuvid.so.545.29.02 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 /usr/lib64/libnvidia-opencl.so.545.29.02
This requires some testing and adjustments with specifics to your setup, but is definitely possible to use the integrated Intel card and or rely on a system without X installed to run the CUDA components.
CUDA
Packaging
- Previously in the repository was included the GPU Deployment kit. This was constructed with NVML (NVIDIA Management Library) headers, docs and samples from a separate tarball. The separate tarball was using a different version number than the drivers and was packaged in the
nvidia-driver-NVML
andnvidia-driver-NVML-devel
packages. Starting from CUDA version 8, the NVML header is provided by a CUDA subpackage (cuda-nvml-devel
) and no longer provided as part of the GPU Deployment kit. - Included is also the Video Codec SDK (Decoder/Encoder) headers, docs and code samples. Again, this uses a different version than the drivers.
- All the libraries are split into subpackages, much like in the original Nvidia CUDA repository. This allows you to install and build software relying on specific components without the need to install all the CUDA toolkit just to satisfy a library dependency. Also, for the same reason, static libraries have been included in each respective
static
subpackage. - In addition to the libraries bundled in the CUDA toolkit, also the cuDNN library for distributed neural networks is included in the repository. See the table below for details.
Distribution and CUDA version support
All the currently supported Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions (including rebuilds and similar forks – CentOS Stream, AlmaLinux, RockyLinux, EuroLinux, etc.) and Fedora versions are available.
In case of yet unsupported compilers in recent distributions, a compatibility cuda-gcc
package is available that brings the distribution to a working level with nvcc.
By installing the cuda-gcc
package, a variable is loaded automatically that adds the appropriate NVCC options to override the default system GCC when compiling:
$ cat /etc/profile.d/cuda-gcc.sh
export NVCC_PREPEND_FLAGS='-ccbin /usr/bin/cuda'
CUDA installations
To install just a runtime CUDA support (required for running CUDA enabled programs), without DDX drivers:
yum -y install cuda nvidia-driver-cuda
To just install packages required for enabling CUDA development:
yum -y install cuda-devel
Or if you just want to enable everything:
dnf/yum -y install nvidia-driver nvidia-driver-cuda cuda-devel
A couple of examples. Just the basic tools:
# yum install cuda Last metadata expiration check: 0:30:55 ago on Tue 05 Feb 2019 06:52:50 AM CET. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================ Installing: cuda x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 17 M Installing dependencies: cuda-libs x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 8.6 M nvidia-driver-cuda-libs x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 25 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 3 Packages Total download size: 51 M Installed size: 178 M Is this ok [y/N]:
The basic tools along with all the libraries (note that the NVML headers are included):
# yum install cuda-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:35:09 ago on Tue 05 Feb 2019 06:52:50 AM CET. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: cuda-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 1.6 M Installing dependencies: cuda x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 17 M cuda-cublas x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 31 M cuda-cublas-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 32 M cuda-cudart x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 135 k cuda-cudart-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 533 k cuda-cufft x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 64 M cuda-cufft-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 127 M cuda-cupti x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 1.4 M cuda-cupti-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 226 k cuda-curand x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 38 M cuda-curand-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 61 M cuda-cusolver x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 40 M cuda-cusolver-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 15 M cuda-cusparse x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 27 M cuda-cusparse-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 28 M cuda-libs x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 8.6 M cuda-npp-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 58 M cuda-nvgraph x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 68 M cuda-nvgraph-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 13 k cuda-nvjpeg x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 372 k cuda-nvjpeg-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 14 k cuda-nvml-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 53 k cuda-nvrtc x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 6.3 M cuda-nvrtc-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 15 k cuda-nvtx x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 33 k cuda-nvtx-devel x86_64 1:10.0.130-1.fc29 fedora-multimedia 41 k nvidia-driver-NVML x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 457 k nvidia-driver-cuda-libs x86_64 3:415.27-4.fc29 fedora-multimedia 25 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 29 Packages Total download size: 650 M Installed size: 1.6 G Is this ok [y/N]:
An example where your CUDA application just uses the CUDA Runtime API and not the kernel runtime:
$ sudo dnf install cuda-cudart Last metadata expiration check: 0:13:10 ago on Sun Oct 23 13:11:01 2016. Dependencies resolved. ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: cuda-cudart x86_64 1:8.0.44-4.fc24 fedora-nvidia 131 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 1 Package Total size: 131 k Installed size: 536 k Is this ok [y/N]:
This will avoid you pulling in all the libraries as before just because you need a single library. This is useful for example for programs that leverage just some part of the CUDA toolkit, like the Nvidia Performance Primitives for image and signal processing in FFmpeg, and similar things.
Bugs
Just open an issue to the specific package on GitHub.
Thanks so much for the ease your packaging provides.
As of F20 (running F21 now) the proprietary driver stopped responding to adjustments to backlight brightness and remains stuck at, I’m guessing, around 90%.
I’m running a GT218M [NVS 3100M] (from your fedora-nvidia-340 repo).
I’m curious if you have any thoughts on this.
Thanks.
Usually in my Korora I can log-in as user xy and then switch to a log-in for a second user (or more) simultaneously without logging out user xy. I can have two or more users logged-in the same time and jumping from one user to another without logging out a user.
This is not possible with my Korora 21 (Fedora 21) with recent nvidia drivers installed out of repo http://negativo17.org/repos/fedora-nvidia.repo
As soon as trying to log-in a second user I get a “OOPS something went wrong” (from Gnome) on console 2 (Ctrl-Alt-F2) and the already logged-in user on console 1 is logged-out automatically.
May be this due to problems with graphic drivers and/or Xorg.
Here is what happens.
What is wrong?
Rgds
AW
If you look at the log, you can see that there are numerous errors (EE). Are you sure you have only the bundled
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/*nvidia*
files?ls -all /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d
insgesamt 20
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 13. Mär 09:44 .
drwxr-xr-x. 6 root root 4096 30. Jan 08:42 ..
-rw-r–r–. 1 root root 232 22. Jan 11:30 00-keyboard.conf
-rw-r–r–. 1 root root 106 5. Aug 2014 99-nvidia-driver.conf
-rw-r–r–. 1 root root 227 25. Feb 15:10 99-nvidia-modules.conf
Look also at this http://fpaste.org/205473/14278221/raw/
Nothing else found.
I have now
uname –all
Linux xyz 3.19.1-201.fc21.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 18 04:29:24 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
But also with older kernels these problems were existing.
Rgds
AW
This solves the problem
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=192259
Is this file
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-nvidia.conf
with may be useless content
Section “Device”
Identifier “Nvidia Card”
Driver “nvidia”
VendorName “NVIDIA Corporation”
EndSection
necessary?
Rgds
AW
It is not, on Fedora 22+ the driver is loaded through the drm class (file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-nvidia-driver.conf). I don’t ship the file you’re mentioning in my packages, so don’t know where you got it.
Thanks! I install 340 drivers from your repository, and a few days everything was fine, but then (possibly after Yum partial update, but without kernel!) was again loaded driver novieau and disappeared 3-D effects… How to disable novieau and check the installation?..
Hi!
Thanks for the repos. Everything is working great! However, I have a questions. I’m sorry if it’s very “newbie” for all of you, but I figure that other might have the same question.
All I did to install the driver was:
– Install repo
– Remove othe nvidia drivers
– And: yum -y install nvidia-driver cuda
I thought that I would need the akmod module to make sure that the driver do not breatk after kernel update. But I did not install it, did 2 kernel update after that and everything is working great still.
So, my question: On a standard Fedora installation,
– Why would I install akmod modules?
– Why would I install dkms driver?
Thank you!
If you have installed
nvidia-driver
and did not specifyakmod
ordkms
, you will getakmod
by default on Fedora. Do you needcuda
?ok, got it. Thanks for the reply.
You are right. I probably don’t have any programs using cuda… Handbrake maybe? Probably not. I installed it, I figured that it would not do much harm to have it installed…
Hi! Whether it is possible install driver version 340xx? My graphics card – NVidia 200, so never version of the driver does not work …
Please read the above comments… There is a 340.xx repository along with the other one:
http://negativo17.org/repos/
Hey– Thanks for this project. I LOVE your repos!
I discovered that after installing or upgrading (kernel along with new nvidia driver) a line in Grub2 is still loading nouveau or, at least, passing arguments to it. Right after that statement is a blacklisting of nouveau. I always boot into the “Ooops! Something went wrong.” every time I boot. When I removed the nouveau line from Grub and ran grub2-mkconfig and rebooted, the log-in screen came right up along with by secondary monitor. I’d thought I’d share that here. BTW, I’m always running the latest stable Fedora (21 at the moment).
Thanks again!
Matt Hutchinson
Fedora 21 running on a Lenovo W540 installed in a docking station.
I am running into the same “Oh no! Something has gone wrong!” issue after installing the nvidia driver and akmod packages given here. The only way I was able to recover was to switch to a tty console, and uninstall all of the nvidia code.
I will try again and remove the nvidia switches (except the blacklist one) from the boot line.
Just tried again, this time removing nouveau.modeset=0 from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, but it didn’t make any difference. I still get “Oh no! …”
This is to actually re-enable Nouveau, which you don’t want.
I also have to ctl-alt F2, log in as root and run the nv modprobe command (can’t remember it off the top of my head).
Hello,
I have tried to install your nvidia drivers today – unfortunately, it was a bit a bumpy ride and is not working fully.
First of all I’ve removed RPMFusion packaged, then I have installed nvidia-driver and dkms-nvida via yum from your repository.
1. After boot nvidia module is not enabled and system boots into 1024×768 resolution. Installing nvidia-xconfig and running it fixes the resolution issue, but…
2. compiz does not work – how do I enable compiz?
Many thanks,
Marek
You need to be more specific, this is totally vague.
Which distribution are you running? Fedora 21? Have you then removed akmod after switching to dkms? What do the Xorg, dkms log say when you have a 1024×768 resolution? Does the kernel module compile and load cleanly? Have you removed/reset your xorg configuration (there should be no /etc/X11/xorg.conf file if you are running Fedora 21+).
Which desktop environment are you running? Compiz can’t run everywhere. Have you checked that you can run it?
Hi!
Thanks for reply!
Yes, I am running Fedora 21 with MATE-Desktop.
Yes, I’ve used compiz with MATE-Desktop with no issues with akmod drivers 🙂
Yes, I did remove akmods before installing dkms drivers.
Yes, there was no default xorg.conf file – akmods seemed to work without it with no issues.
Yes, modules did compile cleanly though dkms was complaining about missing dkms.conf.
To fix the low resolution had to install nvidia-xconfig module from your repository and run it – it created an xorg.conf with bunch of settings. Only:
Section “Device”
Identifier “Videocard0”
Driver “nvidia”
EndSection
seemed to be required for nvidia driver to load.
To enable compiz/OpenGL had to add the following lines in order to get OpenGL load correctly:
Section “Files”
ModulePath “/usr/lib64/nvidia/xorg”
ModulePath “/usr/lib64/xorg/modules”
EndSection
Sadly, after making everything work, totem would not play videos at all – I would only see the white screen. The reason I wanted to use your drivers was to get the native video rendering on my 2560×1440 screen… so had to revert back to akmods. After revert vidoes still don’t play in Totem, though VLC works fine.
Will have time to play more with your drivers at weekend.
Many thanks for your reply and comments!
All the settings you have added to
/etc/X11/xorg.conf
are already inside the packages in the following files:/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-nvidia-modules.conf
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-nvidia-driver.conf
I don’t recall seeing 99-nvidia-*.conf files there after installing your drivers… as I said – I’ll give it another go on the weekend. Thanks!
Hey thanks for the repositories mate! Would you have any idea when the driver will be available for fc22/kernel 4.0*?
Hi,
many thanks for your great work. Yuor procedure it’s the only one that makes me able to install nvidia driver on my laptop. Anyway after all the installations yuo’ve suggested i’m unable to set my video resolution properly. it’s blocked and setted in a bad value. how could i change it please?
Thank you so much.
Maybe you have a broken EDID. Try to read X.org man pages (
man xorg.conf
) and Nvidia documentation (in/usr/share/doc/nvidia-driver
) on how to override it.Well, slaanesh, I could be no less than thankful to you for posting about nvidia x fedora issues, so common to so many users. But unfortunately your instructions did not solve my problem, which was simply to install the latest nvidia driver. I have tried many of the available solutions without success. My laptop worked with the bumblebee, as per installation instructions in fedora site, but, as you say, bumblebee is a hack. So I returned to the noveau driver, despite all shortcomings. At least I can have my laptop working! Running fedora 21, however, I am still stuck with the bug of two displays and video instabilities already described elsewhere. I have to turn off display 2 every time I log in. Better this than nothing.
Hi there! I want to play CS:GO in my CentOS 7 with NVIDIA Drivers and I can’t install nvidia-driver-libs.i686 because of a missing dependency ( libvdpau(x86-32) ). I have been seeking for a solution but I didnt find it!
Any idea? Thanks!
Hello, yes, my fault, I forgot to upload. It should be solved now. Thanks for reporting.
Don’t know if this is important but wanted to report it all the same:
Thanks, will look into it.
ffmpeg
is compiled with OpenCL support in the RPMFusion packages.Are you using OpenCL for encoding?
Was actually just listening to an ogg file when I noticed it.
I’m using Fedora 21 x86_64 with kernel 3.18.3-201 and nvidia 346.35 in my notebook. To be able to use external monitor using HDMI, I followed the standard xorg.conf available in the Internet. But I could only use the external monitor, the notebook monitor is undetected.
xorg.conf
Section "ServerLayout"
Identifier "layout"
Screen 0 "nvidia"
Inactive "intel"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "nvidia"
Driver "nvidia"
BusID "01:00:0"
Option "ConstrainCursor" "no"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "nvidia"
Device "nvidia"
Option "AllowEmptyInitialConfiguration"
EndSection
Section "Device"
Identifier "intel"
Driver "modesetting"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "intel"
Device "intel"
EndSection
Output of xrandr:
Screen 0: minimum 8 x 8, current 1920 x 1080, maximum 16384 x 16384
HDMI-0 connected primary 1920x1080+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 1600mm x 900mm
800x600 60.32 +
1920x1080 (0x27f) 148.500MHz
h: width 1920 start 2448 end 2492 total 2640 skew 0 clock 56.25KHz
v: height 1080 start 1084 end 1089 total 1125 clock 50.00Hz
Is there a way to enable the notebook screen? Previously before 346, I have LVDS-1 shown and was able to use both the internal and external monitors.
Can you paste your Xorg.log somewhere? (fpaste, etc.)
The problem seems to be fixed with the combination of kernel 3.18.7-200 and nvidia driver 346.47
Installing the package nvidia-driver-cuda gives you nvidia-smi.
Hmm now that you say that, I think that was packaged i installed originally. While working on the conky script, I let Fedora 21 run some updates. One of them was a new kernel, I believe it moved to 3.18. something. I wonder if that’s what cause all my issues instead of me installing the nvidia-driver-cuda. Thank you so much slaanesh and will keep you posted once I get home from work tonight and let you know what I discover. I really do appreciate everything you do for the Fedora Community.
Oh oh now I did it. I was working on my conky background layout. I wanted to show the actual clock speed of my 780 Ghz Edition on it. I needed nvidia-smi to show that information. Fedora reported your missing this package, please install (I believe it was) nvidia-cuda. I did and my conky script worked awesome until I rebooted. Fedora 21 would just stop when the blue bars where moving. I went ahead and switch to terminal 2. I removed /*nvidia/* and reinstalled the driver from start again. Now it loads and it crashes at the Gnome start up with a grey screen.
Can anyone give me some guidance and what I can do to repair and what should I have installed to get the nvidia-smi tool?
Thanks for any help. Did not sleep very well last night thinking how to fix this today.
Assuming you are using Fedora 21 (you have not specified) you can start by deleting /etc/X11/xorg.conf and rebooting. This should start X with the default settings and load the appropriate driver depending on the new DRM class (see above comments).
Then, if it does not start anyway look in the logs, module status, etc.
Thanks I am using Fedora 21. I will try that. Can you tell me what package I needed to install in order nvidia-smi.
Hi
Thank you very much for your great work. Really very helpful.
I have a fresh Korora 21 Beta 64Bit (remix from Fedora kororaproject.org) installed on UEFI.
I installed “yum install nvidia-driver akmod-nvidia kernel-devel”.
Bootings with secure boot enabled produce always a “oh no something went wrong – log out” on GDM. No log-in possible. Access only by console with Ctrl-Alt-F2.
Disabling secure boot in UEFI for bootings does the trick. Now GDM allows log-in and driver Nvidia 346.35 runs fine.
Behaviour is reproducible constantly.
So no secure boot on UEFI possible.
Please investigate.
Greetings from cantone San Gallo to Lugano.
Rgds
AW
Hello,
yes, drivers do not work with Secure Boot enabled. There are two ways to resolve this:
– Rebuild the kernel modules always with the same key, and enroll the key in your system’s key database. I can’t do this for you, as I would need to send you the private key and thus rendering Secure Boot useless.
– I could ship you a prebuilt binary and the public key only to enroll it, but you could not regenerate the rpm and would require me to sync binary updates along with the official kernel packages; which is almost impossible.
Unfortunately there is no easy way for this, so my suggestion is not to use the binary drivers if you need Secure Boot enabled. Please see this link with instructions from Redhat:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7-Beta/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html
And this article that also covers UEFI Secure Boot:
http://negativo17.org/complex-setup-with-nvidia-optimus-nouveau-prime-on-fedora-20/
Hi.
Some applications in Fedora segfaults with libGL implementation of latest nVidia driver (from this repository). Please see [1] for details. The problem is something I don’t really understand much.
Do you experience same issue with nVidia driver from this repository?
Do you experience same issue with nVidia driver from RPMFusion?
Try to install and run nomacs. It should segfault.
Thank you.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181085
Sorry but so far I’ve not experienced this. Driver wise, these packages and RPMFusion ones should exhibit the same problems. The driver are shipped in binary format, the difference is only on packaging and on the accompanying tools (nvidia-{settings,xconfig,modprobe,persistenced}.
Thanks very much for the hard work. Got my legacy card working with the 340 driver and akmods –force. Finally understand the differences in the different Nvidia drivers.
Hi!
Can not go forward with nVidia drivers installation. Can you prepare step by step installation instruction?
I still get the “Oh no! Something has gone wrong.” information.
There is a lot of information from people who successfully installed nVidia drivers but there is no complete how-to.
Following steps described here-in or even somwhere else still leads to problem with driver installation.
I believe that step by step instruction will help people like me to enjoy full features of nVidia drivers under Linux.
I have installed:
nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-346.22-2.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-346.22-2.fc21.i686
opencl-filesystem-1.0-2.fc21.noarch
nvidia-libXNVCtlr-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-settings-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-driver-libs-346.22-2.fc21.x84_64
nvidia-driver-libs-346.22-2.fc21.i686
dkms-nvidia-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-driver-346.22-2.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-driver-cuda-346.22-2.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-persistenced-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-xonfig-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
I run nvidia-xconfig and as an output I got warning that the X configuration file cannot be locate/open and the xorg-server was not found in the pkg-config search path, however xorg.conf file was created.
No sucess after reboot.
Hi,
Don’t know if it will help but, in my case, installation on F21 always went wrong, but simply rebooting after the GNOME error message “fixed” the problem.
HTH,
André
The detailed instructions are printed above, there’s not much to add. Just check that your module is built and loaded.
You can remove all of these:
nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-346.22-2.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-driver-cuda-libs-346.22-2.fc21.i686
opencl-filesystem-1.0-2.fc21.noarch
nvidia-driver-cuda-346.22-2.fc21.x86_64
nvidia-persistenced-346.22-1.fc21.x86_64
You will not need them if you don’t need to run CUDA enabled programs.
I run dkms install -k 3.17.8-300.fc21.x86_64 -m nvidia -v 346.22 –verbose. Drives has been compiled successfully, but after reboot I am still in the same place.
What I am missing to sucessfully enable nvidia drives?
I have founf in the Xorg.0.log file that the glx module is loaded but it generates errors.
Module glx )libglx.so) is loaded from /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions folder instead of /usr/lib64/nvidia/xorg folder.
Probably this is the root cause of my problem. Can you help me to solve this problem? Is it a simple way to fix it?
Hi!
Found the problem – xorg.conf created in /etc/X11 folder after run nvida-xconfig command made X server impossible to start. After xorg.conf removal and following reboot I can enjoy X server running on nvidia derivers.
On the other hand. Do I need to reinstall (dkms install etc. …) drivers either if new driver version will appear (now I have 346.22, and new one 346.35 is available) and new kernel version will appear?
Another question is about snippets in xorg.conf.d folder. Can you post some examples for monitor video card, mouse, keyboard etc. configurations?
What about snippets order (question in terms of labeling Identifiers) – is it relevant or not?
If you are running Fedora 21, there should be no /etc/X11/xorg.conf, so please delete it and start from scratch if you want to override the default configuration. Remember that unless you are doing something specific, you don’t need to edit xorg.conf directly. Keyboard and mouse sections are particularly useless.
When updating, the packages will take care of everything, you don’t need to perform any action.
Hello..
First of all thanks for the tutorial and for maintaining the repo..
Maybe you can help me because I’ve been searching for days for a solution. I have a GTX 650 and since I installed the nvidia driver I simply cannot get graphical boot. I have managed to get grub to the resolution of 2560×1080 bott as soon as fedora starts to boot I get back to an ugly resolution with no graphical boot..
when I boot the live media I have graphical boot but I guess that’s because it is using the nouveau driver.
here is my /etc/default/grub:
GRUB_TIMEOUT=5
GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
GRUB_DEFAULT=saved
GRUB_DISABLE_SUBMENU=true
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="rd.lvm.lv=fedora_hal-terminal/root rd.lvm.lv=fedora_hal-terminal/swap rhgb quiet rdblacklist=nouveau nomodeset"
GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY="true"
GRUB_THEME=/boot/grub2/themes/DarkFedora/theme.txt
GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX="keep"
GRUB_VIDEO_BACKEND="vbe"
GRUB_FONT_PATH="/boot/grub2/themes/DarkFedora/Droid-Sans.pf2"
GRUB_GFXMODE="2560x1080x32"
GRUB_BACKGROUND="/boot/grub2/background.png"
Hello,
you cannot have graphical boot with the nvidia driver enabled and the PC in bios mode. The nvidia driver expects only vga to be present on the console, otherwise it will throw an error. It can work with vesa on the console, but it’s not supported and you will still get the notice.
What is supported, is UEFI graphical boot. The system will use efifb for the console and the nvidia driver for the DDX.
See the table at the end of this article:
http://negativo17.org/complex-setup-with-nvidia-optimus-nouveau-prime-on-fedora-20/
Where can I find the opencl-filesystem package for CentOS 7? It doesn’t appear to be on epel.
Hello, yes, there is a mistake. The package is only available for Fedora and internal RHEL builds. I’m updating all driver releases/builds with the fix. Please give a few hours for the upload. Thanks for spotting!
how to install 340 ??
I installed repo “nvidia-repo”
this command “yum -y install nvidia-driver” install by me driver 346 and this vs dont work.
please what is theyum command to install 340 vs
thx
I maintain a compatibility repository at:
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia-340/
You can use that. Same procedure as the updated ones.
Fedora 340 repo is great, works fantastic and it saved me from trouble when I upgraded F20 to F21. You should add a note on blog post that it exists so people would find it easily.
Thanks for all of this 🙂
Hi there!
Since I updated with fedup from F20 to F21 my nvidia drivers were missed somewhere in the universe (GeForce 9400M card, so 340xx).
I followed your guide and I have propietary drivers again. Really you finished one of my worst headaches since long.
Keep the good work!
Hi!
Just installed:
dkms-nvidia-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
nvidia-driver-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
nvidia-driver-libs-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
nvidia-libXNVCtrl-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
nvidia-settings-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
nvidia-xconfig-346.22.1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
from your repository.
How to configure Fedora to use nvidia driver, since after installation I do not see xorg.conf configuration file in the /etc/X11 folder?
Since Fedora 21 (and CentOS/RHEL 6.6 with newer Xorg) there is no need for an Xorg.conf file. The configuration is using the new “OutputClass” directive (
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-nvidia-driver.conf
). Please look at the driver page as I’ve described it there.Hi there. Thanks for your great work with the 340xx series driver. It made my laptop usable on Fedora 21, after I’d bashed my head against RPMFusion’s version for hours.
I was wondering if you’d be willing to apply this patch to the 340xx driver series, or if it was even possible to do given Fedora’s kernel. I have the same issue laid out in the bug where resume-from-suspend causes graphical corruption every time. It’s not too annoying, since I can just “Alt+F2 -> r” and reload GNOME but it’s still undesired behaviour.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1210077
Or, if you know any way of getting rid of this corruption through a grub/driver setting, that’d be great too!
Thanks a bunch.
I will rebuild and update when I come back on the 8th of January, I’m currently travelling through Indochina without connectivity. Thanks for letting me know.
Nice! I’ve been suffering with graphical corruption after suspend as well, I thought it could be related to the fact that 346.22 is marked as beta on Nvidia site, but I tried 343.36 from RPMFusion and the problem was still there. Hopefully this patch will fix this problem 😉
Hello, the patch you are pointing to is already included since the 331.67 release. Probably the problem you are experiencing is related to something else.
Hi,
is there any specific reason for the F21 drivers to be beta (346.xx) and not the stable ones (340.xx or 343.xx)?
Thanks for the great repo!
I’ve recently switched from Ubuntu to Fedora 21 and I did not want to install RPMFusion just for the Nvidia drivers for my 660ti, so I was surely happy when I found this alternative – I like the clean documentation and you seem to know what you are doing.
Keep the good work up!
Thanks for your words!
Any issue or improvement you think should be added please let me know.
Dude!
Thanks so much for your comprehensive and clearly worded instructions, and indeed your repos themselves. New Fedora 21 installation this weekend, beating my head against a wall with Nvidia drivers, no 340xx series drivers available in Fusion, 304xx broken and uninstallable. Your 340 repo really came to the rescue.
Keep up the good work!
Thank you very much for your kind words!
Hi,
I just installed F21, and for some reason nvidia driver is not working, gnome just shows that vague error page saying that “something wrong happened”. I have a GTX 750 Ti that was working just fine on F20. Any tips on how to understand what’s wrong?
I followed the instructions to the letter, the only thing I had to workaround was the installation of kmodtool, I had to disable gpg checking because for some reason rpmfusion is providing the F20 package instead of F21.
To make matters worse, nouveau is not working, and either I fix this or I’ll have to go back to F20…
Nevermind… I just rebooted today and it just worked 🙂 One of my last attempts to fix the problem probably did it, I guess I was just one reboot away from success 😉
RPMFusion has updated all release* packages recently for the Fedora 21 release, try to run an update.
Hello negativo17. First of all I wanna say thank you for your work. I came here to ask you – how about nvidia driver installation key? I use Fedora 21 with enabled Ultra Fast and Secure Boot UEFI options and I need import key which should be in
/usr/share/nvidia/
folder by mokutil. The problem is i cant find him in/usr/share/nvidia
after installation driver from your repository. I have to manually download nvidia driver from nvidia’s website, then manually install it and in the installation process choose option to generate key. After that i have to import that key withsudo mokutil --import /usr/share/nvidia/nvidianvidia-modsign*.der
then restart computer and add key using Shim UEFI Keys Manager. Where nvidia driver from your repository put the key? Or maybe driver from you repositories doesn’t generate key during the installation process? Please reply me on my email or in the comment below. I’ve marked option “Notify me the new posts”.Hello, thanks for the information.
No I haven’t tried doing what you describe. Usually I disable UEFI Secure Boot if using the Nvidia Drivers. I will include required files and instructions on the page.
How do you “add key using Shim UEFI Keys Manager”? Can you provide the commands?
Nevermind, just found it here. Will add instructions and required files to the various packages:
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html
Hello, I have a problem with the new Fedora 21. With the 340 driver, I got stuck on gnome-shell start, just after GDM login.
Gnome shell hangs with 90+ CPU load and I can’t go beyond a grey screen.
Ok, I fixed it. For anyone having same problem, just remove the ‘gnome-shell-extension-background-logo’ package
sudo yum remove gnome-shell-extension-background-logo
Thank you! You saved my F21 installation.
hello..
want to try this primarilly in order to use gpu rendering in cycles, cuda being a prerequisit..
a question pops, excuse my ignorance.. new to .rpm/ yum..
taken that rpmfusion needs to be added/ enabled, for akmod to work, how do i point to the wanted drivers?? as in, not the rpmfusion ones??
thanks..
Hello, all the instructions to do what you are asking are in the page.
Hi, nice packaging.
Any chance you could also provide ‘legacy’ drivers? Just noticed my card is no longer supported by the latest drivers, only by the 340.xx series…
There’s a repository for them here, but I’m not sure how long I will maintain them:
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia-340/
Cool, thanks!
I could not build the kernel module for Fedora 21. It says missing auto.conf and autoconf.h somewhere in the middle of the akmod log. My kernel is 3.17.3-300.fc21.x86_64
Is there a way to fix that or is it possible for you to provide the rpm for the kernel module?
You’re missing the
kernel-devel
package that matches your system. Follow the instructions on the page and rebuild the modules (akmods --force
) or reboot.I do have the matching kernel-devel
kernel-devel-3.17.3-300.fc21.x86_64
I have been using akmods –force successfully with the packages from rpmfusion before. Suddenly it stops working. Not sure if it is the nvidia part or the fedora part that breaks.
Have you looked at the logs?
I still could not get it compiled with akmods. It turns out not missing those files, but something else that I could not figure out. If you could kindly help, the log is available at
Click here to see the log
At the start of the error , it says
In file included from /tmp/akmodsbuild.w3LHxRAw/BUILD/nvidia-kmod-346.16-x86_64/_kmod_build_3.17.4-300.fc21.x86_64/nv-linux.h:107:0,
from /tmp/akmodsbuild.w3LHxRAw/BUILD/nvidia-kmod-346.16-x86_64/_kmod_build_3.17.4-300.fc21.x86_64/nvlink-linux.h:14,
from /tmp/akmodsbuild.w3LHxRAw/BUILD/nvidia-kmod-346.16-x86_64/_kmod_build_3.17.4-300.fc21.x86_64/nvlink.c:13:
/tmp/akmodsbuild.w3LHxRAw/BUILD/nvidia-kmod-346.16-x86_64/_kmod_build_3.17.4-300.fc21.x86_64/nvlink.c: In function 'nvlink_init':
include/linux/pci.h:1122:45: error: 'KBUILD_MODNAME' undeclared (first use in this function)
__pci_register_driver(driver, THIS_MODULE, KBUILD_MODNAME)
Hi,
Great that you’ve built the 346 beta drivers for fc21, but the 343 packages seem to be gone. Example :-
But the install says :-
I’ll try installing the 346 rpm manually for now
You simply had the old metadata on your computer and I had already uploaded the new packages and metadata on the site. Next time, just delete your yum cache; there’s no need to do anything manual:
Hi,
first of all thanks for packaging the new nvidia driver for fedora!
Runs fine here on a F20 installation but there is one thing i miss…
Kernel-RT support.
The RPM-Fusion driver worked well with akmods enabled to build for the ccrma-kernel but this here is different. Don’t know if nvidia changed something or maybe its the packaging?
Trying to –force the build give me this errror:
*** Failed PREEMPT_RT sanity check. Bailing out! ***
Any Ideas? Things i can try?
Thanks!
Hello, the kernel module is compiled with
IGNORE_PREEMPT_RT_PRESENCE=1
. Which driver version are you using? Can you check that this is passed during the build in the logs?Also, where is the RT enabled kernel on planetccma? I can’t find it.
Thanks for your reply!
You can find the rt-kernel here:
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/mirror/fedora/linux/planetcore/20/x86_64/repoview/
Tried it with this package:
akmod-nvidia-343.22-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm
also have all the depencies and devel-packages installed.
Just found the above error in logs.
Hi,
i changed the spec file and rebuild the akmod with success. yay!
Don’t know where you added the option but this way it worked for me:
best regards
But this is the same that is available in the SPEC files of akmod packages that I’m providing:
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia/SPECS.340/nvidia-kmod.spec.akmod
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia/SPECS.343/nvidia-kmod.spec.akmod
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia/SPECS.346/nvidia-kmod.spec.akmod
I couldn’t compile ccminer without nvcc so I didn’t try (and it is the only cuda application I use), but sure I can help test when I get some time. Without nvidia-modprobe, ccminer would not run saying that it could not query the number of CUDA devices; I looked up the error and saw calls to nvidia-modprobe so I tried installing it and then it worked. Do you have my email, or IRC?
I have your email, thanks. Will send you the link with the packages (hopefully tomorrow) after reviewing them.
Many thanks!
I found that nvidia-modprobe is essential for getting libgpuarray installed (which is used for the computation package Theano, for instance) – so there’s some functionality in there that people are relying on…
Can you provide some info/link? On the drivers, it is needed only if the character devices are not available when the driver is initializing.
Actually, I’m revising my (too hasty) opinion about
nvidia-modprobe
. The issue was rather with the directory structure that Theano assumes – I put together .OTOH, would it be possible to get
nvidia-smi
? Apart fromlsmod
, there doesn’t seem to be an easy way to check whether the install has worked (assuming command-line GPU server, rather than graphics workstation).Many Thanks for all your hard work!
For anyone who runs into the same problems I did, trying to run ccminer using this driver package: make sure to install
nvidia-driver-devel
/nvidia-driver-cuda-libs
andnvidia-modprobe
, these are not normally brought along with the driver installation. I’m using a cuda toolkit 6.5 installation separate from RPMs as I’m not sure how to compileccminer
with the packagednvidia-driver-cuda
. (I also installednvidia-driver-cuda
for thenvidia-smi
binary.) But I am just glad to have an up to date packaging of the driver.Actually to get all headers required for compiling software against the Nvidia driver libraries you should just install the
nvidia-driver-devel
package; this will pull in almost all of the original Nvidia tarball:The package
nvidia-modprobe
should not actually be needed anymore (I’m offering it for compatibility reasons) as the main driver gets loaded automatically and the UVM extra module is loaded through an UDEV rule:What is exactly that your setup was missing that needed you to install the
nvidia-modprobe
package?Thanks.
There is a bug in the
nvidia-persistenced
package. It tries to start/usr/bin/nvidia-persistenced
, but the daemon is installed to/usr/sbin/nvidia-persistenced
.Another question, do you have the “nvcc” program packaged? It normally comes with the cuda installation from nvidia, but I cannot find it with a yum provides search.
Thanks for spotting the mistake, I’m updating all
nvidia-persistenced
packages now.Regarding CUDA binaries; I have packaged the latest CUDA libraries and binaries (6.5.19) and I’m looking for someone to test them before publishing them along with the rest of the Nvidia packages. Are you interested to test them and give some feedback?
Any chance to an
akmod-nvidia-173xx
akmod-nvidia-304xx
akmod-nvidia-340xx **
type setup like the other legacy drivers?
So… updated and now I’m getting:
NVRM: The NVIDIA GeForce 210 GPU installed in this system is
NVRM: supported through the NVIDIA 340.xx Legacy drivers. Please
NVRM: visit http://www.nvidia.com/object/unix.html for more
NVRM: information. The 343.22 NVIDIA driver will ignore
NVRM: this GPU. Continuing probe…
Any way to downgrade?
I’ve added a repository with 340 drivers after various requests:
http://negativo17.org/repos/nvidia-340/
Just point yum to it and do a
yum distro-sync
.Thanks! 🙂
I really like nouveau, but I can’t change the refresh rate (I have a d-sub monitor :()
Thks for the info, and for providing support for legacy cards. I will probably upgrade my graphics card in the near future but, in the meantime, being able to use NVidia drivers would be great. I am currently running Nouveau as a workaround, and overall it indeed works fine, but aside from the worse performance, it also has some issues (sometimes it freezes after login on GNOME, Google Sheets doesn’t redraw sometimes on Google Chrome etc.).
I just installed driver 343.22 on F20 and system fails to boot on graphic mode. I have a 9800 GT, and driver 343.22 release notes state that “removed support for G8x, G9x […] Ongoing support for new Linux kernels and X servers, as well as fixes for critical bugs, will be included in 340.* legacy releases through the end of 2019.”
Probably a dumb question, but does the G9x above includes the 9800GT? If so, which driver should I download? It seems that there’s no 340-legacy packages yet.
Replying to myself: yep, 9800 GT has been officially labeled legacy with the release of 343.x driver series (full list of cards here). So, I guess I’ll just have to revert back to nouveau until 340xx legacy drivers are available… :-/
Any ETA?
I’m creating a separate repository for the 340 branch as yours it’s not the first request I receive. Will post it on the blog once it’s ready.
Please note that today’s games do not run well on old hardware such as the 9800GT, and if you don’t play games and don’t need full hardware acceleration the nouveau driver is more than fine.
The repository has been created. Just grab the appropriate *340.repo file and put it in place in
/etc/yum.repos.d
.To sync you can use the
yum distro-sync
command.Example for Fedora when using aKMOD packages:
Wow, that was fast! =) I just installed, and it is working flawlessly. I’m back in the game 😉
Thank you so much for such awesome support =))
So where’s the libcudart.so.5.5 for 64-bit.
I keep getting:
error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.5.5: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
That’s part of CUDA 5.5, which I’m not packaging. It seems you’re loading the 32 bit libcudart.so.5.5 in your 64 bit environment.
Thought it was a negativo17 repo problem because it happened when I did yum update…
But something about this started to sound familiar so I went back through my notes. Managed to find that I had this problem before and found my fix: (so I’m good now)
First of all, this has nothing to do with
libcudart
libraries error you were referring to. Second, this is all wrong as you’re duplicating libraries all over, including linking x86_64 in i686 folders.To find the library you are requiring type the following command:
This will tell you that it’s in the
nvidia-driver-devel
package; so assuming you are on an x86_64 system, the only thing you need to do to have the library on the system is to do the following:Second step is to make sure your system can find the CUDA libraries. Copying the libraries you require somewhere else is totally wrong. You actually need to make your system find the CUDA ones instead.
Copy the two
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia-lib*.conf
files as/etc/ld.so.conf.d/cuda-lib*.conf
and replace the contents with your cuda paths.Afterwards, rerun
ldconfig
to rebuild the library cache. Runningldconfig -p | grep library.so
will tell you where the system is getting its libraries.i’m using an old quadro nvs card to drive four displays via xinerama (no twinview at all). i’m using the rpmfusion driver setup. lately i’ve run into a bizarre problem where the display locks (while displaying vibrating patterns) and then often triggers a crash/reboot. the logs are devoid of anything interesting or useful. i’m interested in trying your setup. is it safe and easy to switch back & forth between rpmfusion and your setup? will my xorg.conf file get clobbered/rewritten?
Hello, it’s easy to switch back and forth using akmod, just backup your xorg.conf file:
But if your problem is due to the binary driver; unless you change the driver itself there will probably be no benefit. If the versions I’m hosting are the same as RPMFusion ones, then you will have the same problems for sure.
I have this weird situation (that I’ll admit I haven’t fully debugged yet) With the nvidia package from nvidia.com everything works.
After installing your drivers (and reinstall xorg and various other things) I can log in if I init 3, startx. But the gdm menu either doesn’t come up or when it does logging in as a user gets a bunch of white boxes or full white screen. Any ideas where to start looking?
We ran into the same problem at work–
sudo vim /etc/gdm/custom.conf
and uncomment the #WaylandEnable=false line
This was part of the fix for us.
Actually on Fedora 22, the login screen/session work like follows:
– If using the OSS drivers, GDM is launched on wayland
– After login, the Xwayland servers for compatibility are launched as user processes
If disabling Wayland:
– If using the OSS drivers, GDM is launched as user “gdm” and not “root”
– Desktop session is run on another X process start as the user who logged in and not “root”
If using binary drivers:
– The system detects it and both GDM and user sessions have X running as “root”
So actually it should not be needed to explicitly disabling wayland in GDM.
I’m probably missing something obvious but will this support Optimus cards and allow switching / powering off and using external monitors?
It’s written in the page, if you use the OpenSource (intel and nouveau) drivers and kernel 3.12+, dynamic power on/off of the cards works out of the box. The card of course will not power off if you’re using the external monitor.
akmod needs
kernel-devel
package which has to be installed seperately. please include this also in above instructions..akmods
already requires the latestkernel-devel
package; there’s nothing to be installed separately. You can check by runningrpm -q --requires akmods
.Do you have any plans to support bumblebee?
I personally think Bumblebee is a hack. I support the official Nvidia implementation (i.e. X.org configuration) or the fully open Prime solution.